« November 2006 | Main | January 2007 »

December 28, 2006

Edwards Announces Presidential Run in New Orleans

by Glynn Wilson

NEW ORLEANS, La., Dec. 28 - In one of the most novel presidential announcements in American political history, John Edwards stood in a muddy back yard in the Ninth Ward in blue jeans and said he chose the site to formally say he would run for president in 2008 because the neighborhood is a prime example of the two America's he's been talking about for years.

The growing divide between the rich and poor is a theme he's pitched since leaving a lucrative law practice in North Carolina nearly a decade ago to give something back by getting involved in politics.

john_edwards2.jpg
Photo by Glynn Wilson
John Edwards announces for president as a modern-day populist, in blue jeans...

"New Orleans is a place where you can really see the two America's I've been talking about. You can get out here and see what the problems are and take action to do something about it," he said. "Instead of staying home and complaining, we're asking Americans to help. We want people to take responsibility, to join this campaign to actually take action now, not later, not after the next election."

The former Democratic Party vice presidential nominee and U.S. Senator said his campaign will be a grass roots, ground-up campaign for people "not afraid to get their hands dirty."

The domestic economic issues in his campaign platform will include raising the minimum wage, pushing for universal health care and rolling back President George W. Bush's tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. And in a nod to labor, which could help swing the Democratic Party's nomination to Edwards next year, he said he has already been involved in and will continue to push for the organization of American workers.

"We need to ask Americans to be patriotic on something besides the war," he said. "We need to get rid of some of the tax cuts for the people at the very top."

He said he will also champion taking action on global warming, including raising taxes on the oil companies and investing in alternative energy sources.

"We need to ask Americans to be patriotic and conserve energy," he said.

He also said America needs to lead by beginning to pull the U. S. military out of the quagmire in Iraq.

"We need to reestablish America's moral leadership in the world. We can't do that without beginning to pull our troops out of Iraq," he said. "This needs to be done now, not after the next election."

He said it would be a major mistake to escalate the U.S. military's involvement in Iraq with more troops, as the president seems to be on the verge of announcing - in part at the urging of Sen. John McCain, who could be the chief competition for Edwards in the run for president if both win their party's respective nominations.

In fact the entire presidential race in 2008 could come down to opposing philosophies on this issue, some experts already think, especially if the war continues to go badly and the conflict still holds center stage as the campaign heats up next year.

"If America doesn't lead, there is no stability in the world. It's just chaos now," Edwards said. "It's our responsibility to lead. The world needs to see our better angels, and they will respond to us differently."

As he has in the past, Edwards admited his vote in support of the resolution Bush used to justify the invasion of Iraq was a mistake.

On the controversial issue of national health care, Edwards said he would not shy away from pushing for universal health care unequivocally.

"We need it desperately," he said.

When asked at the press conference about one of his alleged weaknesses, his limited experience in government, especially in foreign affairs, Edwards took his biggest swipe at the Bush administration.

"Rumsfeld and Cheney had a lot of experience, but the war is a disaster," he said. "Experience does not guarantee good government, vision or the ability to adapt to a changing world."

Bush was also criticized in 2000 for his total lack of experience in foreign affairs and was expected to focus on domestic economic issues as president, until 9/11 intervened. Historians now say the outcome of the war in Iraq is likely to define his presidency, and not in an altogether flattering way - unless something changes drastically in the next few months.

Edwards said he has been traveling around the world since the 2004 campaign and has learned a lot that will help him if he is elected president.

On MSNBC's political show "Hardball" a couple of weeks ago, Edwards handled this issue by proving he could name most of the world leaders thrown out by Chris Mathews - unlike Bush in 2000, who got stumped.

When asked what he would do to counter the notion held by the national punitry that Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were the early front runners - even though neither have announced - Edwards refused to go negative. He said America needs good people in government and politics, especially in the presidential campaign in 2008.

But he indicated he has hope that the "ground will begin to shift" after his announcement, set as it was in New Orleans' Ninth Ward, one of the most devistated areas in the country by the nation's worst national disaster ever.

If he had been president at the time, he said, he would have been on the ground finding out what needed to be done and taking action.

December 20, 2006

A Book for Down Time, Media Reform Coming

By Ronald Sitton

NORTH LITTLE ROCK (Dec. 20) - My recent down time for gall bladder surgery gave me an opportunity to read UAM English professor Mark Wegley's copy of "American Gods" by Neil Gaiman following Wegley's showering praise of the book and the author, who spoke at a conference at the University of Central Arkansas this fall.

I spend so much time reading texts and literary journalism that I seldom make time for fiction. "American Gods" justifies taking a break from the norm.

The book starts with a prisoner, Shadow, who's waiting to get out of jail. The warden stops by to let Shadow know he can go home early. Seems like a good sign? Not really. Shadow finds out his wife and best friend died on the way to pick him up from jail. At the funeral, he finds out his wife caused the wreck because she was performing fellatio on his best friend. Shadow discusses the incident with his dead wife the night after her funeral. Things get interesting from there.

The general theme behind "American Gods" suggests immigrants brought their gods to America and then forgot about them. Without continual belief and ritual, the gods lose power. Mr. Wednesday, who happens to be rounding up the old gods for an apocalyptic battle with newer gods, gives Shadow a job as bodyguard. Shadow must decide what he believes while he practices coin tricks to pass the time.

Though Gaiman does a good job describing some of the older deities, I never understood the reasoning behind why one god would be more powerful than another. Nor does Gaiman confront any current deities except to point out where victors of a battle would do their best to wipe out belief in the old deities, including assuming the holy days for their own deities. However, it made me want to pick up Bulfinch's Mythology.

Gaiman's book flows such that you don't really realize where time goes as you pick it up and put it down. For the college crowd, it's a nice break from the mundane.

Grade: B+

Notes oF INTEREST
Lake Okechobee Violated

Government Attempts to seize ACLU documents

Save the Internet

The National Conference for Media Reform

I'm planning to attend this conference in January, though I still need to find a hotel. Confirmed speakers include:
# Jonathan Adelstein, FCC Commissioner
# Ben Bagdikian, author, "The Media Monopoly"
# Eric Boehlert, author and journalist
# David Brancaccio, PBS
# David Brock, Media Matters for America
# Adrienne Maree Brown, Ruckus Society
# Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy
# Rosa Clemente, R.E.A.C.Hip-Hop
# Jeff Cohen, writer and media critic
# Flavia Colgan, MSNBC commentator
# Mark Cooper, Consumer Federation of America
# Michael Copps, FCC Commissioner
# Malkia Cyril, Youth Media Council
# Davey D, DJ and Hip Hop Activist
# Phil Donahue, Television Host
# Laura Flanders, radio host
# Linda Foley, Newspaper Guild-CWA
# Jane Fonda, Actor and Co-Founder, Women's Media Center
# Kim Gandy, President, National Organization for Women
# Dan Gillmor, Center for Citizen Media
# Juan Gonzalez, New York Daily News
# Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!
# Robert Greenwald, Producer and Director
# Maurice Hinchey, U.S. Representative
# Ben Hooks, Civil Rights Leader
# Janine Jackson, FAIR
# Rev. Jesse Jackson, Civil Rights Leader
# Van Jones, ColorofChange.org and Ella Baker Center
# Gene Kimmelman, Consumers Union
# Mark Lloyd, Center for American Progress
# Rev. Tim MacDonald, Civil Rights Leader
# Robert McChesney, President, Free Press
# Bill Moyers, Journalist and Author
# John Nichols, Journalist
# Alex Nogales, National Hispanic Media Coalition
# Anthony Riddle, Alliance for Community Media
# Paul Rieckhoff, Iraq & Afghanistan Veterans of America
# Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Media Access Project
# Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge
# Matt Stoller, MyDD.com
# Makani Themba-Nixon, the Praxis Project
# Helen Thomas, Hearst Newspapers
# Gloria Tristani, Benton Foundation
# Cenk Ugyur, The Young Turks
# Katrina Vanden Heuvel, The Nation
# Noah Winer, MoveOn
# Rev. Lenox Yearwood, Hip-Hop Caucus

December 14, 2006

Krystal Ball: Who Looks Presidential For 2008?

Presidential Tip Sheet: Early Bet on Edwards

gwcubamug.jpg

Looking under the hood of the muscle car in the Krystal parking lot, it looks like John Edwards could be the next president of the United States.

Here's why.

In this early week in the race for president in 2008, rendered important due to new Democratic Party rock star Barack Obama's early hints he may run and the resulting step up of Hillary Clinton's reelection schedule, Edwards also stepped up in the public eye. Edwards the trial lawyer and vice presidential candidate and his smart yet southern wife Elizabeth out hardballed Chris Mathews of MSNBC on Tuesday.

For reasons I'll explain later, he already has a head start in the early primary and caucus races in Iowa and New Hampshire, and will emerge from the pack as the electable moderate southerner with the strength of character to pull off being president. When you think about it, he even looks a bit like Tony Blair - but without the penchent for supporting George W. Bush.

Former U.S. Sen. John Edwards, who has been traveling the world since focusing on his major populist theme of solving the poverty problem here and abroad, was the recent top choice among likely Iowa caucus-goers asked to say who they would support in the 2008 caucuses. Edwards, who has traveled to the state extensively since the 2004 campaign when he was the Democrats' vice presidential nominee, won the support of 36 percent of those polled. U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., finished second at 16 percent. Obama got 13 percent.

Edwards has been working on an upgrade to his profile as the son of a mill worker, the story he used to get the Veep nod after strong early primary showings in 2004.

Trust us when we say this will become even more important as the 2008 approaches and economists officially announce the economic recession. Yes, it will be out of the bag by then.

Edwards has not declared his candidacy yet, so to learn about his recent activities you have to go to his One America Website.

Edwards may also be in a good position from a horse racing point of view. He can refine what his plan is riding loosely in third or fourth and wait for the next turn, while most of the media spotlight shines on the two early leaders on the rail, Hillary Clinton and Obama.

A Cook/ RT Strategies poll looking at the Democratic Party's crowded field of contenders shows Clinton leading public opinion with 34 percent. Obama is a distant second with 20 percent, even though he may not even run.

Former Vice President Gore, who has been testing the track's surface of late while fishing for an Oscar for his Global Warming film, still gets the support of 11 percent of the people, while Edwards gets 9 percent.

Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts tied with 4 percent. Everyone else - New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, and retired Gen. Wesley Clark, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio - scored 2 percent or less in the survey of Democratic voters and Democratic-leaning independents.

Taking Gore out of the race, Clinton rises 5 points to 39 percent, Obama gains 1 point to 21, Edwards goes up 2 points to 11 percent. Kerry picks up 2 points to 6 percent.

Without Gore or Obama in the race, Clinton goes to 51 percent and Edwards grabs second place with 13 percent. Without Gore, Obama, and Kerry, Clinton gets 52 percent and Edwards 14 percent.

But that is before the race has even officially begun.

We still like Al Gore and think he should have won in 2000, and he would prove to be a much more loose and effecitve campaigner now, we suspect. So if he runs, he will be a major contender and may even get our votes.

But then, why would he want to go through it all again - when he can have far more fun and potentially be even more effective on the outside?

Gore on the Web

Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Cleveland, Ohio, who ran as the Ralph Nader of Democrats in 2004 and didn't get very far, made an impasshioned speech for peace this week in making his announcement that he would run again.

His key point: "What kind of credibility will our Party have if we say we are opposed to the war, but continue to fund it?"

He says the Congress has already set aside the $70 billion it would take to get American troops out of Iraq and home, and he is suggesting we face facts and do that - rather than give President Bush another $160 billion supplimental appropriation to continue the war for another year?

Dennis Kucinish on the Web

Which brings up another reason Edwards could emerge as the front runner during the primary process.

Expect to hear Bush take John McCain's advice, not Jim Baker's. Watch this.

In a month, Bush will go on national television and ask Congress for even more money to send another 40,000 to 50,000 MORE troops to "win" a "victory" - "Over there." He still doesn't get it.

Coupled with the inevitable recession, if this war is still dragging out that will make it very hard for any Repubican to "win" in 2008.

The obvious leader will be Sen. John McCain of Arizona. A few months ago he looked like the only hope the country had. But since his foray to the major-domo of the Christian Right, the Rev. Jerry Falwell, and his recommendation for more troops, McCaiin is likely to sink like a horse with a stone embedded in his hoof before this is all over.

Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney will pursue the GOP nomination (ho, hum) and may well be joined by Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas (yech!), Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (yawn), Rep. Hunter of California (who?), and Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado (give us a break).

The question marks in the Republican race are former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (har, har).

Although national polls of Republican voters often show Giuliani at the front of the GOP's 2008 pack, most observers with a real grasp of the Republican nominating process think Giuliani's support for abortion rights, gay rights, and gun control knock him out of any real chance of winning the nomination.

Cook Political Report/RT Strategies polled Republicans and Republican-leaning independents about the 2008 contest. When Giuliani was included in the list of candidates, he ran first with 27 percent, followed by McCain at 25 percent and Gingrich at 10 percent. Romney ran fourth with 9 percent. Everyone else was in the low single digits.

Taking Giuliani out of the mix, McCain's support rose from 25 percent to 34 percent and Gingrich's climbed from 10 percent to 16 percent. Romney edged up to 10 percent. No one else drew more than 5 percent, according to the Cook Political Report.

Then there's today's front runner on both sides, Hillary Clinton. But does anyone really think she can really win the presidency? Her negatives with men are way to high for her to have a chance, unfortunately.

If the Democrats really choose 2008 to be the year of the woman in American politics, then McCain could very well be the next president.

You will recall that one of the early front runners in the 2004 presidential race, now Democratic Party Chair Howard Dean, said that to win, the Democrats need to appeal to the NASCAR vote.

If John Edwards is listening, here's a tip on how he can win this thing. Get yourself a muscle car, go to Nashville and make some CMT-style music videos. In essence, start hanging out in the Krystal parking lot and talking it up. Get yourself a cowboy hat. Go country.

The liberals in New York, D.C., California and the other cities, can't win this thing without some working class votes in the South. And they will never, not in a million years, vote for Hillary.

Edwards has the union bona fides to talk the talk and walk the walk. He may even be able to carry Alabama in two years - once the economy goes in the tank and the war gets even worse.

How about Obama for Veep and president in 2016?

December 13, 2006

A Retirement Home For Out of Work Journalists?

gwcubamug.jpg

by Glynn Wilson

The newspaper industry is in trouble, and in no measure, it's because of out of touch people like William Bunch, a senior writer for the Philadelphia Daily News who also publishes a blog.

His latest misinformed missive was the lead story today on the Poynter Institute's media blog put together by a little guy named Jim Romenesko.

Romenesko: Your daily fix of media industry news, commentary, and memos.

First, here's some of what he had to say, followed by my response.


I'm a fan of some conspiracy theories. And so really, what could be a more compelling conspiracy theory than the plot to destroy the American newspaper, hatched - in our imagination anyway - by a secret cabal of bloggers and Web gurus meeting in a diner off Calle Ocho in Miami, then launching their assault on circulation from a Grassy Knoll somewhere in cyberspace?

Except this is one conspiracy that can be easily debunked. The American newspaper is being assassinated by "a lone nut." And we're going to tell you the name of that lone nut:

Craig Newmark of Craigslist . . . a man whose altruistic vision of running a business to NOT maximize profits is now threatening the livelyhood of thousands of working men and women across this country, your neighbors who work at and publish your local newspaper, jobs that were once supported by the classified ads that have migrated to the most free . . . Craigslist (sic: dot org).

Last week, Newmark's co-conspirator (OK, he's not a totally "lone" nut) - his CEO Jim Buckmaster - told stunned Wall Street analysts how they're happy to forego profits to save you a couple of bucks on a classified ad, and put some of my best friends on the unemployment line in the process. They even leave on the table money in ways that wouldn't come directly from their customers:

If you won't charge customers for ads, and apparently you won't, then at least start accepting those text ads, and funnel those millions of dollars into the newly formed Craig's Foundation. And what will be the main benefactor of this new foundation? A scholarship fund, to pay for the college education of the dozens of displaced journalists across America losing their jobs everyday. . . . And if there's any cash left, how about building a retirement home for any newspaper folks who might somehow see a diminished pension down the road?

The "lone nut" theory of the American newspaper assassination


Since no one else will ever set the record straight on this, apparently, perhaps because they have not studied the issue enough to be in command of the facts, let me have a go.

It's not that much of a mystery to me why newspaper reporters do not understand what's going on here. Most of them got into newspapering in the first place because they could not do math. And from their early days in the business, they shunned any knowledge of the business side of newspapering, believing that to know the facts about business would jeopardize their objectivity.

But anyone who has ever worked as an academic, teaching journalism, should be familiar with the literature on how newspapers make money to pay reporters. And its not from classified ads or the price of a subscription.

Admittedly, a lot of academics don't have those facts at their disposal for a variety of reasons. I once got into a heated argument with a faculty member at a reputable regional university who insisted out of ignorance that the Washington Post was a national newspaper, for example. But anyone who knows the facts here, including the publisher and the circulation manager at the Post, knows this to be true: The Post made a conscious decision not to invest in regional printing plants and daily distribution across the country like USA Today, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. It is a metropolitan newspaper with distribution in D.C., Maryland and Virginia.

They now have an opportunity with the Web Press to reach out to a national and international audience, however, and so far they seem to be capitalizing on it - without charging for access to their Web edition.

So let's be clear. Craigslist.Org is not putting any newspaper reporters out of work because the revenue from classified advertising never, ever went for paying the salaries of reporters in the first place. Nor did the price of a mail subscription or the price of the paper in the newsstand or box on the corner.

The price of the paper itself has always been earmarked primarily for the cost of distributing the newspaper. If anything was left over from that, it went for the cost of printing the newspaper.

Fact: It costs nothing to print or distribute a newspaper on a Web Press. It does cost a little to put it online, but nothing compared to the millions of dollars of paying for and maintaining an offset press, not to mention the rising cost of paper and ink.

Classified ads in newspapers has been a source of revenue for paying staff at newspapers, but mostly for the production and circulation staff. News staffs and most of the employees of newspapers have always been paid from general advertising revenue.

So perhaps Mr. Bunch should redirect his ire at Craigslist toward building a retirement home for newspaper delivery boys and pressmen.

But guess what? There's an antidote to Craigslist and the newspapers have it in their power to overcome the threat from the competition. If they would just stop bashing the online revolution and join it, they are in a powerful position to take advantage of it. If newspapers would just invest in original journalism and put it online for free, thereby putting themselves in a position of generating a massive amount of traffic AND online advertising revenue, they could survive.

They could even start their own free online classifieds to compete with Craigslit. They could sell Google text ads and pocket all the money and brag at the end of the year to their stockholders.

But apparently, newspaper managers (and columnists) are so out of touch with the reality available right in front of them that they will go on bashing the Web until they are out of business.

When that day comes, us former newspaper reporters who understand the Web Press will be right here to take over where they left off - if there is a First Amendment left after Bush's appointments to the federal bench get done with sending it to the trash heap of history.

December 08, 2006

The Gall of It All

Darren McFadden won the Doak Walker award, annually given to the nation's best running back, last night in Orlando, Fla. It marks the first time for an Arkansas back to receive the award, and one of the few times an Southeastern Conference player has won.

While I admit McFadden is the best player to come through Arkansas in my lifetime, I wonder how much more dangerous he'd be if the Razorbacks had a passing attack to go with its ground game. Though Houston Nutt brought in Guz Malzahn to improve the balance between run and pass, Arkansas ended up in the same position as last year's SEC mark - first in the run, 11th in the pass.

Nutt won SEC Coach of the Year and McFadden took SEC Player of the Year honors this past week. I'm proud of them, but I wouldn't have voted Nutt for the position. That honor should have gone to Rich Brooks of Kentucky, who went from firing fodder to a bowl game for the first time since the Tim Couch era.

Although Nutt gained his first 10-win season at Arkansas, it shouldn't have been so surprising. Granted, if you had told me the Razorbacks would be in BCS contention in November, I'd probably have laughed, but historically, Arkansas wins running the ball behind a senior-laden offensive line. Look up front and the Hogs will graduate over half the starting line next spring.

Maybe that will get Nutt to think about actually improving the passing game over the spring. Although he apparently does not always understand when to keep his mouth shut, Mitch Mustain went 8-0 as a first-year starter. He represents the future of Arkansas football if there's going to be a future on the national scale. I can understand Nutt pulling him for not taking care of the ball in the South Carolina game, but I cannot understand not using Mustain with championship aspirations on the line.

I guess I'll get to find out New Year's Day. An old friend called out of the blue to ask if I wanted tickets to the Capital One Bowl as he lives in Tampa Bay. After promising my wife that she doesn't have to buy me a Christmas present, we accepted the offer to go to Florida during the holidaze. It doesn't hurt that Ron wants to see the tape of the wedding and Tanya wants to show it.

All-in-all, it's a nice change-of-pace to what was starting to look like a crazy December. Apparently my churning stomach had nothing to do with Razorback football, but with gall stones. I'm about to drive to a doctor to see about getting them removed. I wonder if he also can perform a frontal lobotomy on Nutt?

December 02, 2006

Championship Weekend

by Paul Rockne

It's Championship Weekend for Southeastern Conference football – and for several other leagues as well – with the surprising Arkansas Razorbacks representing the Western Division and the not-so-surprising Eastern Division champion Florida Gators going head-to-head for the SEC title Saturday in the Georgia Dome in Atlanta.

The Hogs and Gators would figure to grab all the football headlines this week … but they didn't as the Alabama Crimson Tide captured the media attention - almost pushing the SEC championship game into the background except in Arkansas and Florida – by abruptly firing head coach Mike Shula and announcing a nationwide search for a new coach.

The word "again" belongs at the end of the last sentence. The slap-in-the-face firing of Shula brings the Alabama football program back around to where it has been all too often in recent years – in a search for another head football coach. Tide Athletic Director Mal Moore is currently engaging in his fourth search for a new coach in his tenure.

Shula may have deserved being fired but the feeling from here is that, considering the mess he inherited with Dennis Franchoine's sudden departure for greener pastures, the Mike Price debacle and NCAA probation, he deserved at least another year. With the losses this year being as close as they were, many oh-so-close to being a victory, the odds were good that the Tide could/would have produced another 10-win season in '07.

Shula was, obviously, both disappointed and surprised when Moore made the Sunday night call. After all, Shula had done what he had been hired to do – clean up the Alabama image. He never embarrassed the university on or off the field. There were no drunken nights along the T-Town strip, no accusations from secretaries, no rumors of affairs or any other improprieties. He worked hard, recruited hard and gave the best he had for four years.

On the other hand, long-time Bama fans couldn't have been surprised at Shula's fate. After all, Shula went 0-4 against Auburn. Bill Curry was fired as the Bama head coach for not being able to beat Auburn – and his overall record was much better than Shula's. When Bear Bryant was being interviewed for the head coaching job in Tuscaloosa, the first question asked of him was: "Do you think you can beat Auburn?" Despite the loss to Mississippi State and the mediocre record this year, if Bama had beaten Auburn in the '06 Iron Bowl, Shula would still be captain of the Tide football fortunes.

But whether Shula should or shouldn't have been let go is not as important as how he was treated. The slap-in-the-face manner in which the whole affair was handled will make it harder to find and hire a good replacement – in fact, only another Bama grad or former player should even consider taking the job.

Some big-time names have been named as possible replacements for Shula – Steve Spurrier, Nick Saben, Rich Rodriguez, Bobby Patrino, Paul Johnson, Jim Grobe, Houston Nutt – but most have been quick to deny any interest in the job. That could be how they really feel or just part of playing the game. But if they have been watching events closely as they unfold, the above-mentioned coaches who are all successful in their present positions with their present teams will think twice – or more – times before they sign on the dotted line with the University of Alabama.

The powers that be at Alabama waited until late Sunday to hand Shula his walking papers and made Shula look like a naïve fool in the process. After twisting in the wind for eight days following the Iron Bowl loss, the former Tide QB and son of one of the winningest coaches in NFL history, told his players and assistant coaches at an early Sunday evening meetinig not to believe the rumors of his impending demise and to get their minds on the upcoming bowl game. Less than two hours later, he was gone.

That insult, that slap in the face, should serve as a warning to candidates in the present coaching search. If the way Moore and Company treated Shula is the way it treats one of its own, how will they treat an outsider with no ties to the Bama family?

Perhaps Alabama's only hope is a second resurrection - Bear Bryant coming back for a second go. But who knows? In these days of instant gratification and lack of patience, Tide fans might not even give Bear a break.

Oh yes – the SEC Championship Game. It will be played Saturday (today) at 5 p.m. in the Georgia Dome. Florida is a 3-point favorite. The two teams have met just six times before, with the Gators holding a 5-1 edge. It will be the fourth SEC title game matching two teams ranked in the top 10.

This weekend's championship college football TV schedule kicked off Friday night with the Conference USA title game, in which Houston defeated Southern Mississippi.:

Saturday's championship week lineup is as follows:

Connecticut at Louisville, 11 a.m. (WCSS)
ACC Championship Game, Georgia Tech vs. Wake Forest., noon (ESPN)
Army vs. Navy, 1:330 p.m. (ABC)
Division II title game, Delta State vs. North Alabama, 1:30 p.m. (CSS)
Stanford at California, 2 p.m. (FSNS)
Southern Cal at UCLA, 2:30 p.m. (ABC)
SEC Championship Game, Arkansas vs. Florida, 5 p.m. (CBS)
Troy at FIU, 6 p.m. (CSS)
Rutgers at West Virginia, 6:45 p.m. (ESPN)
Big 12 Championship Game, Nebraska vs. Oklahoma, 7 p.m. (ABC)